another bush staffer speaks out

Discussion in 'Off Topic' started by w2992, Jul 31, 2016.

Help Support The Pipe by donating:

  1. Jul 31, 2016 #1

    w2992

    w2992

    w2992

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2010
    Messages:
    142
    Likes Received:
    0
    Last edited: Aug 2, 2016
  2. Jul 31, 2016 #2

    Zero-G

    Zero-G

    Zero-G

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 13, 2007
    Messages:
    6,589
    Likes Received:
    43
    He lost credibility when he said he was a professor at A&M.

    seriously, he is a financial guy withe no experience in structures, but he's an expert on how buildings fall down? I saw the buildings fall too. I was in a room full of other engineers that all expected the buildings to come down much the way they did once the top of the first one started leaning.

    I Guess that since the Democrats didn't get the bump they wanted out of the convention, and Bill couldn't silver-tounge his wife into the White House, the back-up plan to use whack jobs to further attempt to discredit the Republican Party shall begin.
     
    Last edited: Jul 31, 2016
  3. Jul 31, 2016 #3

    Citation10

    Citation10

    Citation10

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2004
    Messages:
    2,270
    Likes Received:
    7
    Boilingfrog.com. yep excellent source for reliable research.
    Come on man at least post a video that has been photoshopped to look like a UFO. Those links were painful to watch.
     
  4. Jul 31, 2016 #4

    verified

    verified

    verified

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 30, 2008
    Messages:
    924
    Likes Received:
    0
    I want what this guy is smoking.
     
  5. Aug 7, 2016 #5

    w2992

    w2992

    w2992

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2010
    Messages:
    142
    Likes Received:
    0
  6. Aug 8, 2016 #6

    RedRaider217

    RedRaider217

    RedRaider217

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2012
    Messages:
    532
    Likes Received:
    1
  7. Aug 8, 2016 #7

    Kip Dynomite

    Kip Dynomite

    Kip Dynomite

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 20, 2006
    Messages:
    308
    Likes Received:
    2
    More like, what does he use to pass them! Hook me up!
     
  8. Aug 8, 2016 #8

    w2992

    w2992

    w2992

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2010
    Messages:
    142
    Likes Received:
    0
    ad hominem

    You attacked your opponent's character or personal traits in an attempt to undermine their argument.

    Ad hominem attacks can take the form of overtly attacking somebody, or more subtly casting doubt on their character or personal attributes as a way to discredit their argument. The result of an ad hom attack can be to undermine someone's case without actually having to engage with it.

    Example: After Sally presents an eloquent and compelling case for a more equitable taxation system, Sam asks the audience whether we should believe anything from a woman who isn't married, was once arrested, and smells a bit weird

    It is much easier to fool a person than to convince them they have been fooled.

    Ignore is the root word of ignorance

    Information released in 1996 obscured by Monica Lewinsky showed the US government knew of the pending Japanese attack at least 8 days prior but ordered the outdated ships to stay in the harbor to also save demolition cost. See "Magic cables" and court marshal of Admiral Kimmel. It was called Manhattan Project because it continues to make Wall street and bankers rich.
     
  9. Aug 10, 2016 #9

    RedRaider217

    RedRaider217

    RedRaider217

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2012
    Messages:
    532
    Likes Received:
    1
    deflecting

    Avoiding a valid question when you know the answer is going to hurt your argument
     
  10. Aug 11, 2016 #10

    PhantomHawk

    PhantomHawk

    PhantomHawk

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2007
    Messages:
    6,695
    Likes Received:
    27
    It wasn't really a valid question. I highly doubt he has drug issues. I kinda think it goes deeper than that. When somebody initiates a discussion with such an outrageous premise, it's pretty difficult to respond in a rational way.
     
  11. Aug 11, 2016 #11

    The Red Baron

    The Red Baron

    The Red Baron

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 6, 2008
    Messages:
    633
    Likes Received:
    3
    Jane, you ignorant slut!!
     
    redheadtexas likes this.
  12. Aug 11, 2016 #12

    Washout

    Washout

    Washout

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2007
    Messages:
    1,078
    Likes Received:
    4
    Haha. Thanks
     
  13. Aug 12, 2016 #13

    w2992

    w2992

    w2992

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2010
    Messages:
    142
    Likes Received:
    0
    I pray for any empire worshippers that ignore the difference in bombing a defenseless 100% civilian target and a 100% military target that occupied a neutral island 80% inhabited by Japanese. (Hawaii under duress became a state Aug 1959).
    Why did people like Eisenhower, Leahy, and Oppenheimer feel using the bomb was a horrendous mistake? The answer is they had access to classified information that the American people would not see until 1996. All Japanese cities had been completely destroyed, not allowing them to surrender, and leaving only 2 cities intact for their evil mad experiment. So irresponsible with greed they were not sure if the "Trinity Test" chain reaction would cover the planet. It was intended for the Germans but they surrendered too quickly. Hitler could have had the nuclear bomb first but he refused it as being too evil.
    See "Great Artiste" observer William Leonard Laurence aka Leib Wolf Siew and he had also used the name Lipman Siew. Who worked for Bernard Baruch.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2Rv2J-YDTh

    http://www.pacificwar.org.au/foundationJapmilaggro/PerryArrives.htm
     
    Last edited: Aug 12, 2016
  14. Aug 13, 2016 #14

    RedRaider217

    RedRaider217

    RedRaider217

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2012
    Messages:
    532
    Likes Received:
    1
    I also pray for you but for an entirely different set of reasons.
     
  15. Sep 15, 2016 #15

    w2992

    w2992

    w2992

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2010
    Messages:
    142
    Likes Received:
    0
  16. Sep 15, 2016 #16

    j_spicoli

    j_spicoli

    j_spicoli

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 13, 2006
    Messages:
    148
    Likes Received:
    1

    I'm not saying I do or don't agree all this because frankly I don't know for sure either way, but I will say that after all the wars, genocides, people being enslaved to work to death for the profit of another, moms, dads, sons and daughters killing each other for greed, envy, etc, all the people that have been gruesomely tortured, witch hunts, and limitless other atrocities that one person has committed against another, I fail to see what qualifies this discussion as an outrageous premise.
     
  17. Sep 23, 2016 #17

    Matthew Kupetz

    Matthew Kupetz

    Matthew Kupetz

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2005
    Messages:
    1,654
    Likes Received:
    11
    http://911-engineers.blogspot.com/

    ""To estimate the serious damage to the World Trade Center core columns, we assembled a detailed numerical model of the impacting aircraft as well as a detailed numerical model of the top 20 stories of the building," Sozen says.

    "We then used weeks of supercomputer time over a number of years to simulate the event in many credible angles of impact of the aircraft." Sozen says the actual damage to the building's facade that was observed was identical to the damage shown by the numerical simulation.

    ..... Only a handful of architects and engineers question the NIST Report, but they have never come up with an alternative. Although at first blush it may seem impressive that these people don't believe the NIST Report, remember that there are 123,000 members of ASCE(American Society of Civil Engineers) who do not question the NIST Report. There are also 80,000 members of AIA(American Institute of Architects) who do not question the NIST Report.

    Although their field of expertise is not related to the construction of buildings - they don't seem to have a problem with that over at AE911truth - there are also 120,000 members of ASME(American Society of Mechanical Engineers) who do not question the NIST report. There are also 370,000 members of IEEE(Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers) who do not question the NIST report. There are also 40,000 members of AIChE(American Institute of Chemical Engineers) who do not question the NIST Report. There are also 35,000 members of AIAA (American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics) who do not question the NIST report. So who would you rather believe?"
     
    Last edited: Sep 23, 2016
  18. Sep 23, 2016 #18

    Zero-G

    Zero-G

    Zero-G

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 13, 2007
    Messages:
    6,589
    Likes Received:
    43
    I can confirm at least one AIAA member that doesn't question it.
     
  19. Sep 24, 2016 #19

    w2992

    w2992

    w2992

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2010
    Messages:
    142
    Likes Received:
    0
    Every government is run by liars nothing they say should be believed.

    How would any experts know? NIST classified the data that they used to make their computer animation of the WTC7 collapse? Would knowledge of how NIST believes the building collapsed really “jeopardize public safety“?

    Why does media need paid actors promote the story? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-5y8PtfKA14

    Why does NIST ignore 156 witnesses of explosions? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i720Kq_0Zk0
     
  20. Sep 24, 2016 #20

    mja33327

    mja33327

    mja33327

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 4, 2012
    Messages:
    133
    Likes Received:
    0
    Vote Gary Johnson 2016
     

Share This Page