One step thought processes just do what your owner's tell you. Google "Reece committee". Petroleum fuel contrails are toxic enough even without additives. Hydrogen based fuels are prolly better. But its easy waste disposal for the oil companies.
Pretty sure Patrick Henry didn't say "give me security forces or give me death.
"A truth's initial commotion is directly proportional to how deeply the lie was believed. When a well-packaged web of lies has been sold gradually to the masses over generations, the truth will seem utterly preposterous and its speaker, a raving lunatic." -- Dresden James
"When a man or woman is honestly mistaken and hears the truth, they will either quit being mistaken, or they will cease to be honest. "
Because false doctrine is so abundant: "The Truth will be the Strangest Thing you will ever Hear" - Paul Smith
Let me put it in the realm you are an expert in, Aviation, and airline business. If you were to suggest that a large corporation maybe, I don't know decided to spend millions of dollars on Autopark robots for most of their gates when there doesn't seem to be much reward for anyone in that type of expenditure or really much need for the product. And you suggested that perhaps some executive had a relative or friend that owned the company that sells the product and it was all some devious plan to get rich and swindle the public and the shareholders, I would be highly motivated to believe you even though all your evidence is conjecture and conspiracy related. However, if the ruse starts to resemble a Hollywood Movie super villain story you are going to lose me every time.
Let me ask you this. And let me preface this with almost everything your Bush Staffer video guy states, I actually agree with. I do think he had Daddy issues, And I think he was an intellectually lazy President who made lots of poor decisions. But I don't think he was behind an elaborate treasonous crime to start a war and or make a bunch of money for some trillion Aire's building seven owner. Or any of the other crazy (even insane) accusations by the Internet False Flag Zealots who keep piling on and changing their reasons because their original accusations keep getting debunked.....
But why didn't Bush plant evidence that would connect the act directly to Sadamm Hussein? Or anyone for that matter? Why wouldn't he just set the plan in motion, and then heroically stop it? Think about that for a second. If he saved the Country from an attack, that he had full control over, he would have beeen revered as the greatest American Hero EVER. He could have gone to congress and got anything he wanted. But instead he just let it happen so he could go to war? Or was it money? Or was it that other guy who planted charges in the empty buildings? I mean, c'mon man! When you make these accusations out loud, do you hear yourself?
So I went on a bit of a tangent there, but let me get back to my original question. Why do the sights you commonly link purposely reference a Nick Rockefeller the way they do? I know you are familiar with the story I'm talking about. It is so obvious what their intent is. Why don't you have the same skepticism in that type of reporting that you have for so called mainstream media outlets? I mean media does this type of thing all the time and that's why people don't really believe media, but when your sights do basically the same thing, there isn't the same criticism. I share the same cynicism as you, but I am a firm believer in Occams Razor.
Last edited by Left Coast; 11-05-2016 at 02:24 AM.