"If you're a leader, you lead the way. Not just on the easy ones; you take the tough ones too..." - Maj. Richard D. Winters, E Company, 2nd Battalion, 506th PIR, 101st Airborne (Aug. 1942 - Nov. 1945)
"A Government big enough to give you everything you want, is strong enough to take everything you have" - Gerald R. Ford (12 AUG 1974)
"I think people should stop comparing Obama to Hitler. At least Hitler got the Olympics to come to Berlin....." - dynamiteone
I'd also like to add that XJT is merely one of the first of the regionals to go through a change in the way CPAs are negotiated. The majors got taken to the cleaners by their regional partners in the 2000s because of guaranteed profits. The future is going back to the "old way" of sharing risks through pro-rated and short term contracts. The majors can't afford to throw money at their regionals while they're losing money. Just look at SkyWest and Republic, two of the (arguably) more successful regionals: they made billions while their majors lost money hand over fist. All the time playing both sides of the field by flying for competitors.
Anyway XJT might appear to be getting sub-standard contracts now but when the rest of them start renegotiating they'll find much the same.
I'd have to think that Republic will have a difficult time at the negotiation table when their cpa renewals come up. With their recent aquisitions, they may now be seen as direct competition. Why support the competitors bottom line? If I were United/Delta/US air/American , I would definately place that flying in another regional that wasnt competing directly with the particular airline.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Share This Thread