There is no god. - Page 17

Mr Hat · 10-18-2006, 12:20 PM

Okay, I couldn't log in for two days....I don't know why....in that time 6 pages have showed up. So I just breezed through them.

Steve.....from 5 pages ago.....How did I prove any of your points by saying Mahr and Moore freaks? I don't say that due to religious conviction, I say that because I've seen their shows. If they were Christians, they'd be freaks. I pointed them out because they lead the way in weirdo leftist politics. I watched Bill Mahr the other day when BEN AFFLICK of all people had to correct him...Bill said that he felt American women should not be allowed to wear Berkas (spelling?), those Afghani robes that cover women's faces.....He said "It's like tolerating intolerance" because its a symbol of womens oppression in Islam. What a load of racist garbage...If women want to wear whatever they want to wear in a free society, they can wear it. To make it illegal is rediculous, which is what Affleck said....So Mahr replied "Well, what about Klan robes, should those be legal too?" What a moron, first off they ARE legal secondly, this is a free society.....YES THEY SHOULD BE LEGAL. Of course it's my right to say that anyone wearing a Klan robe is an arse as well.

Thats why I say Mahr is a freak and a racist. People who bash christianity with the same fervor are taking up a prejudiced position....which is fine but you need to acknowlege that.

I don't like the thought police.....Yes it used to be the religious right but nowadays is the leftist media that are the thought police. Do you realize that its more rebelious to be a Christian Conservative Republican that likes George Bush these days? That floors me. I watched an interview with the South Park creators (yes South Park was created, not evolved)....the reason they take up a more conservative line is because thats the one that will pi*ss off the most people, which is hysterical to me.

Anyway, the leftist media who blames Christianity for being intolerant is just as if not more intolerant of Christians (or anything that doesn't fall in line with their philosophy for that matter).. That was my point.

The bible, I haven't touched on it. It's there, read it if you want, believe it if you want. But I will tell you that there are a bunch of misnomers floating around on these 11 pages.

10-18-2006, 12:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mario Smith

Your inconsistencies and internal contradictions are amazing. Please for everyone here give us your definition of "blasphemous prayer."

Easy.

Main Entry: blasÂ·pheÂ·mous
Pronunciation: 'blas-f&-m&s
Function: adjective
: impiously irreverent : PROFANE

I will also note, for everyone here, your deafening silence when it was suggested that you're one of the offenders. Can you give an explaination for that?

10-18-2006, 12:42 PM

P.S. It's one thing to accuse someone of inconsistencies and internal contradictions, but quite another to prove they acutally exist. I would be delighted and highly entertained to see the misquotes and word-twisting you would put forward as my "inconsistencies" and "internal contradictions"

Mario Smith · 10-18-2006, 01:15 PM

Moto, my absence can be easily explained. I went to lunch. Are you some sort of paranoid?

Roger the Shrubber · 10-18-2006, 01:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr Hat

Anyway, the leftist media who blames Christianity for being intolerant is just as if not more intolerant of Christians (or anything that doesn't fall in line with their philosophy for that matter).. That was my point.

Christianity, as most religions, are by their very nature intolerant. They are designed to be exclude people on the basis of what they believe. Many even make reference to the "chosen people" ... which I assume are people with foot fetishes.

My question is, if only people with foot fetishes can get into heaven... how is that not intolerant?

V2+15 · 10-18-2006, 01:42 PM

What's the record for 'pages' on a single thread??

Oh good....I just made it TWELVE!!!! :lol:

10-18-2006, 01:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mario Smith

Moto, my absence can be easily explained. I went to lunch. Are you some sort of paranoid?

Man, do I have this guy's number or what? Misquotes and word twists, and right on cue! The word I used, Mario, was silence. As in:

Quote:

Originally Posted by MiyamotoMusashi

I will also note, for everyone here, your deafening silence when it was suggested that you're one of the offenders. Can you give an explaination for that?

So once again, you're misreading me. And misquoting me. And since I posted that in response to a post you made, 'gone to lunch' dosen't really make much sense as an excuse, does it? What were you saying about inconsistencies and internal contradictions?
P.S. You have yet to explain why you're so defensive about the poor behaviour I'm talking about. Do I have your number there as well?

10-18-2006, 01:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Roger the Shrubber

...Many even make reference to the "chosen people" ... which I assume are people with foot fetishes...

Pay attention folks, Roger is bringing his A game today.
Hysterical!!

Stephan Dupourque · 10-18-2006, 02:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MiyamotoMusashi

Example 1:
"Oh, you have cancer? I'll pray for you!" is kind, caring, and good.

Don't be so sure about that. If you are going to pray for me, please don't tell me!

NY Times Health Article

Travelair · 10-18-2006, 02:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chrisu

Quote:

Originally Posted by Travelair

Quote:

Originally Posted by Whydoitry

God doesn't exist. Prove me wrong.

If life is just a random occurance, then why can't scientists, working in ideal conditions, create life? Even simple life? They can modify DNA and genetically engineer but they are incapable of creating even a simple cell organism?.

I'm afraid you missed the boat. Scientists have and still do create life in the laboratory and there are hundreds of patents attesting to such.

Furthermore, scientists have created each and every amino acid known to exist in the DNA chain structurefrom the primordial soup theory.

Some organisms that come to mind are petroleum eating microbes for cleaning oil spills and sub atomic "switches" used in super conducting environments that are actually living organism that eat atoms to create polarity (which are the precursers to genuine artificial intelligence).

As another post said, it would seem the religiously clouded mind conveniently overlooks the truth in order to protect their untruths.

I seems to me when the argument for god and the validity of "religion" runs out of steam, the faithful aways revert to the argument of "faith" as their last ditch effort to support their position.

Imagine if you applied the same concept to flying. This statement is probably said very often by the traveling public:

"I have faith that the airplane will fly"

when in fact "faith" has nothing to do with it. An uneducated flyer who can't comprehend physics might argue to the end that "faith" made the plane fly when most of us would argue that "faith" is irrelevent because we have a bigger picture.

"Faith", when it comes down to it, is completely insupportable. A more enightened person might call "faith" luck and someone heavily schooled in science might call it "chaos theory".

In the end, "faith" is in the eye of the beholder while the reality of science is there to see.

Just my opinion FWIW. I've noticed nobody arguing the side of faith and religion has taken the opportunity to post to the interesting points in scab hater's posts.

His/Her posts pose some serious questions to the "other" side and it woud appear that the "faith" proponenents have quietly skated around the concepts as they usually do when challenged with providing even the tiniest bit of TANGIBLE proof or non "faith" based arguments.

I look forward to some responses to scab hater from "FAITH'S" soldiers as surely you won't let someone poke such large hole's in your beliefs without a reasonable response.

[/code]

Wow! I go on a four day and this turns into one of the longest threads in recent memory. I looked into your accusation that I was wrong about life created in labs. It did disturb me but I found what I was looking for. These oil eating bacteria are found in soil. They are gentically engineered. I didn't bother looking up the other example you listed because it was too much of a PITA to find an article detailed enough to explain the method of oil spill eating bacteria engineering.

As far as creating all the amino acids in the soup theory -- Great! Now mix 'em all together and throw 'em out back and see what starts to grow.