|
| The Pipe Anything related to ExpressJet (and then some). What's on your mind? |
 |
|
 |
04-10-2008, 10:13 AM
|
#1071 (permalink)
|
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 83
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheBills
Not true. 100%??? If that were the case religion would be trumped, and I think there is more evidence to prove against evolution. Many scientists can prove otherwise, yet they are rarely, hell never, recognized thanks to the media. It all comes down to faith in the end, which obviously you dont see but might be looking for, either way that is OK.
|
What evidence would this be? These ''many scientists" you refer to... who are they? The scientific community is in agreement on evolution. Its a fact. Indisputable, like it or not. Evolution is happening right before our eyes. How about bacteria becoming resistant to antibiotics, or insects adapting to become pesticide resistant? What about pathogens jumping the species gap, like BSE (mad cow), or Avian flu? These are all examples of evolution. Period. That you may not believe believe evolution answers all question about the origins of life on Earth is another matter, but to say "there is more evidence to prove against evolution" is sheer ignorance.
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
04-10-2008, 10:21 AM
|
#1072 (permalink)
|
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 29
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by PA Dude042
What evidence would this be? These ''many scientists" you refer to... who are they? The scientific community is in agreement on evolution. Its a fact. Indisputable, like it or not. Evolution is happening right before our eyes. How about bacteria becoming resistant to antibiotics, or insects adapting to become pesticide resistant? What about pathogens jumping the species gap, like BSE (mad cow), or Avian flu? These are all examples of evolution. Period. That you may not believe believe evolution answers all question about the origins of life on Earth is another matter, but to say "there is more evidence to prove against evolution" is sheer ignorance.
|
again micro evolution these bacteria haven't turned into a crab they are STILL bacteria...still a gap...wink
|
|
|
04-10-2008, 10:25 AM
|
#1073 (permalink)
|
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Whale's Vagina, CA
Posts: 273
|
Let's take all science back from those godless scientists.
reDiscovery Institute
__________________
I'm sorry I'm not sorry. I'm not going to apologize. I'm a cocksman.
"Alright, uh.. later dudes. S you in your A's, don't where a C, and J all over your B's." - Charlie Kelly
|
|
|
04-10-2008, 10:44 AM
|
#1074 (permalink)
|
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Whale's Vagina, CA
Posts: 273
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2percent
again micro evolution these bacteria haven't turned into a crab they are STILL bacteria...still a gap...wink
|
That is not how evolution works. If you want to think like that so be it, but you are badly misinformed. If you truly want to understand it this website may help.
29+ Evidences for Macroevolution: the Scientific Case for Common Descent
__________________
I'm sorry I'm not sorry. I'm not going to apologize. I'm a cocksman.
"Alright, uh.. later dudes. S you in your A's, don't where a C, and J all over your B's." - Charlie Kelly
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
04-10-2008, 11:22 AM
|
#1075 (permalink)
|
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 37
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Yariv
Gabriel12, we're not trying convince anyone, just discussing whether we can prove god exists or prove god doesn't exist. this isn't about faith, it's about proof. by definition faith doesn't require proof (which makes faith illogical). we've defeated pascal's wager (which you refer to) several times by saying that it applies equally to belief in any god or gods, and in aliens, speagetti monsters and santa claus. you're suggesting that not-believing is faith, because it can't be proven. this is acceptable in philosophy, but not in logic. in logic no assumptions can be made unless there is a basis. if we can't prove santa claus doesn't exist, this doesn't mean we have faith in his non-existence. it means logically that we have NO REASON to believe he exists until evidence is shown that suggests or proves his existence.
.
|
So, you aren't trying to convince anyone, including yourself that you are the right ones? Because it seems to me the 100 plus posts isn't just a discussion, but an attempt to bash religions, bash people's faiths, and to convince yourself that your nonbelief in God is the correct one because, according to you, it cannot be proven.
As far as Pascal's wager applying equally to aliens, santa clause, the boogy man, etc. Is there really a comparison of getting Christmas presents from a man in a red suit and going to Heaven or Hell? If you tend to think that these comparisons are about the same, then I think there seems to be something illogical to what reality is for you, but, then again, that is just my personal opinion. As someone has written in the recent posts, (again, I am too lazy to go through all of the pages, so this is just based on recent posts), yes, someone only believing based on pascal's wager doesn't necessarily mean that they have true faith in God, but sometimes, their beginning wager belief can help them become more knowledgable in their religion, which finding out the facts, can and usually does, bring them to a more dedicated faith that is no longer founded on a wager, but a true love for God.
The Bible, which from some readers is not proof and others believe, states that Blessed are those who have not seen me and yet believe. Not everyone needs this so-called proof that you seem to need. Even when shown many examples of proof, you won't believe. Is it out of stubborness? Is it out of wanting to not follow another? Don't know...you have your reason.
So, yes, this discussion will probably go on and reach 200 plus pages. Many people will give you examples of what they feel/see as proof, but it won't matter, because anything they say/write will not make a difference in your mind. It will all be bias to you because they are believers....but you seem to not be bias because you don't believe? It seems to me that their are some educated people on here giving you [i]proof[i], but you discount them. It also appears that you and some others would like to blame all world problems on religion, which isn't necessarily the problem but just an outlet of the blame-game. When some people use religion in a negatiive way, would it be the religion's fault or the person that is doing it, or in the cases that some have pointed out, the people themselves at fault? That is like saying that one pilot was doing something that was out of line, so the pilot industry is a sham. Just doesn't make sense, but again, that is my opinion.
Like I mentioned, this will go on and on as a so-called discussion, but what you will notice is that the more detailed information you are given on the proof of God, the more you will find a way to believe in yourself and your belief against it. You seem to be wanting to hear that you are right. So, maybe you just aren't affirmed enough in other areas of your life that you have to come to express forums to make you feel that you have accomplished something...? So, what have you accomplished and where will this, your accomplishment, lead you?
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
04-10-2008, 11:24 AM
|
#1076 (permalink)
|
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 37
|
Oh, and I would like to point out that evolution is just a theory, can't be proven. In fact, as more technology develops, more and more evidence has proven that evolution is illogical.
|
|
|
04-10-2008, 11:30 AM
|
#1077 (permalink)
|
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 29
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wes Mantooth
|
just calling it like i see it... "misinformed".. O now i get it... the majority of this country is misinformed,, if we have FAITH. our education system has let us all down!!! except for you.... funny how i'm "misinformed" ,"don't under stand", "need to do more research"... so far thats about what i get out of yalls argument... i"m the dumb one and you, who "dont't believe in God" are the intellectual ones.. cool i get now... thanks... say all this tung in cheek...
Last edited by 2percent; 04-10-2008 at 11:45 AM..
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
04-10-2008, 11:37 AM
|
#1078 (permalink)
|
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Whale's Vagina, CA
Posts: 273
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2percent
just calling it like i see it... misinformed.. O now i get it... the majority of this country is misinformed,, if we have FAITH. or education system has let us all down!!! except for you.... funny how i'm "misinformed" ,"don't under stand", "need to do more research"... so far thats about what i get out of yalls argument... i"m the dumb one and you, who "dont't believe in God" are the intellectual ones.. cool i get now... thanks... say all this tung in cheek...
|
Never said that. You claim that bacteria doesn't change into a crab. That is not what evolution claims and you are misinformed on the subject. You are fully allowed to be in this argument. It doesn't make you smart or dumb to believe or not believe in God. I'm not going to go over everything wrong with the example you provided, if you want you can go further into it's up to you.
__________________
I'm sorry I'm not sorry. I'm not going to apologize. I'm a cocksman.
"Alright, uh.. later dudes. S you in your A's, don't where a C, and J all over your B's." - Charlie Kelly
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
04-10-2008, 12:01 PM
|
#1079 (permalink)
|
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Out West
Posts: 421
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by gabriel12
Oh, and I would like to point out that evolution is just a theory, can't be proven. In fact, as more technology develops, more and more evidence has proven that evolution is illogical.
|
Just out of curiosity, what technology has been developed that disputes evolution?
|
|
|
04-10-2008, 12:15 PM
|
#1080 (permalink)
|
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 37
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by nixon
Just out of curiosity, what technology has been developed that disputes evolution?
|
Well, indeed the internet is one, being that more people are tuned into the internet, the irrational ideas on evolution are being seen by more and more. Therefore, just by spreading more and more accurate information, more people are looking into actual proof of evolution's disceptions. With more people disputing the claims that evolution is more than theory, less children are taught in the schools that this is fact anymore....which is what I was taught. The teachers weren't stressing evolution as theory, but as a fact that all were to believe.
|
|
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:10 PM.
|
|
|