|
| The Pipe Anything related to ExpressJet (and then some). What's on your mind? |
 |
|
 |
05-14-2008, 02:29 PM
|
#41 (permalink)
|
|
ATP
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Cleveland
Posts: 1,179
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pellegrino
Only if it was a fair and equitable (DOH) integration. SKW could buy us with CBA intact, which states we will be integrated with their list by mutual agreement. Say their idea is to staple us to the bottom of their list. We say no way, and there is no mutual agreement. If the list merger agreement is not reached, it goes to arbitration, and SKW says to the arbitrator XJT would have been bankrupt anyway, they should all go to the bottom. Then it's in the arbitrator's hands to decide if we would have gone bankrupt or not. It's a replay of AA-TWA. That went well.
|
This is exactly what may happen. Guys, just because THEY ink a deal (IF its true) doesn't mean they've caved..... all it means is that we'll hear "give in" from BOTH sets of management.
The one difference in this than AA-TWA is that the whole pissing match started with CAL. They friggin WROTE our CPA themselves, now they don't like it. Dummies.... its THEIR OWN FAULT. Anyways, sure, we have branded that is burning money, but its CAL that forced our hand.
I would think we could have a reasonable case in front of a judge this was a "set up job" from CAL since the IPO. They got their dough and convinced these people to buy at $16.... an now they beg the same people to sell at $3.50 because THEY want to go elsewhere?
THE BOTTOM LINE IS, we don't have other lines of business (ie 70-90 seaters) to subsidize RIDICULOUSLY LOW 50 SEAT CPA's bids, like CHQ and SKYW.... who partially at falult again...... CAL. We are a contract airline.... TWA was not. And the best part is CAL STILL WANTS THE CONTRACT......JEEZ. CAL changed their mind on the CPA THEY wrote before the CPA expired ....... how do they explain that?
Either way, if they throw BK in their, I'm not so sure that wouldn't screw them WAAAAAY more than us, so we ight have to play chicken.
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
05-14-2008, 03:20 PM
|
#42 (permalink)
|
|
ATP
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,548
|
I keep hearing all these people saying "Fck the Sywest deal, ride it nto the ground" but really, is that the plan. All I can say is the Jims have been looking for a better solution for two years with little results, why continue to support these guys, I am open to listening to reasonable ideas. As for Skywest, I have talked to three union reps and gotten three different stories on where everything is, so sounds liek even those guys are all over the place? If we stand alone we have about 12 months or so to find flying before we are out of cash, and in todays market with out credit, if you are out of cash you are shutting down? Open to ideas!
|
|
|
 |
May 13th Blast mail regarding meetings May 14/15 |
 |
05-14-2008, 03:32 PM
|
#43 (permalink)
|
|
Private Pilot
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 66
|
May 13th Blast mail regarding meetings May 14/15
Now I could be wrong but was there not a blast mail yesterday or the day before saying that two more days of meetings are taking place today and on the 15th?? Not sure if that points one direction or the other, but it said that they (MEC) would get word to us ASAP.
__________________
Arguing with a pilot is like wrestling with a pig in the mud, after a while you begin to think the pig likes it.
|
|
|
05-14-2008, 04:00 PM
|
#44 (permalink)
|
|
ATP
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: EWR CA
Posts: 1,429
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Guardguy
I keep hearing all these people saying "Fck the Sywest deal, ride it nto the ground" but really, is that the plan. All I can say is the Jims have been looking for a better solution for two years with little results, why continue to support these guys, I am open to listening to reasonable ideas. As for Skywest, I have talked to three union reps and gotten three different stories on where everything is, so sounds liek even those guys are all over the place? If we stand alone we have about 12 months or so to find flying before we are out of cash, and in todays market with out credit, if you are out of cash you are shutting down? Open to ideas!
|
XJT will be around for more than 12 months, thank you very much
|
|
|
05-14-2008, 04:07 PM
|
#45 (permalink)
|
|
ATP
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,047
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Guardguy
I keep hearing all these people saying "Fck the Sywest deal, ride it nto the ground"
|
And why wouldn't you? Look at what they've proposed and try to give me one sane reason to vote yes. You're hatred for our management is your right, but I wholeheartedly disagree with your opinion.
__________________
IAH CA
USMC Veteran
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
05-14-2008, 05:39 PM
|
#46 (permalink)
|
|
Commercial
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 596
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Guardguy
I keep hearing all these people saying "Fck the Sywest deal, ride it nto the ground" but really, is that the plan. All I can say is the Jims have been looking for a better solution for two years with little results, why continue to support these guys, I am open to listening to reasonable ideas. As for Skywest, I have talked to three union reps and gotten three different stories on where everything is, so sounds liek even those guys are all over the place? If we stand alone we have about 12 months or so to find flying before we are out of cash, and in todays market with out credit, if you are out of cash you are shutting down? Open to ideas!
|
what can you do with $125 oil, at least they were smart enough to hedge. What is your alligance to SKYW anyway, Just want to try it out I guess and see how it goes?
WHy support the Jims because you Sir and everyone else still have a job and they have been looking out for us or would you rather them have caved to 2x chinned larry and the bunch who want something for nothing. Did you think we'd be instantly profitable? you should support them because they supported us, being a "Guardguy" you should know something about loyalty and support even in the bleakest moment.
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
05-14-2008, 06:36 PM
|
#47 (permalink)
|
|
ATP
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Business Center
Posts: 1,267
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by surfrider
what can you do with $125 oil, at least they were smart enough to hedge. What is your alligance to SKYW anyway, Just want to try it out I guess and see how it goes?
WHy support the Jims because you Sir and everyone else still have a job and they have been looking out for us or would you rather them have caved to 2x chinned larry and the bunch who want something for nothing. Did you think we'd be instantly profitable? you should support them because they supported us, being a "Guardguy" you should know something about loyalty and support even in the bleakest moment.
|
Yeah I don't know how Guardguy can piss on the Jims, if we had given the 69 planes to CHQ he would've been on the street with his seniority.
|
|
|
05-14-2008, 07:45 PM
|
#48 (permalink)
|
|
Commercial
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 560
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by luftwolf
See you at the training center which on the right side of the C-47 on July (I believe that is your class date too)
|
Actually already out here...started in May.
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
05-14-2008, 08:38 PM
|
#49 (permalink)
|
|
Student Pilot
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Montgomery, AL
Posts: 9
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pellegrino
Only if it was a fair and equitable (DOH) integration. SKW could buy us with CBA intact, which states we will be integrated with their list by mutual agreement. Say their idea is to staple us to the bottom of their list. We say no way, and there is no mutual agreement. If the list merger agreement is not reached, it goes to arbitration, and SKW says to the arbitrator XJT would have been bankrupt anyway, they should all go to the bottom. Then it's in the arbitrator's hands to decide if we would have gone bankrupt or not. It's a replay of AA-TWA. That went well.
|
Yes, that's exactly what I have been thinking about. Our own management aggreed to pay us by the main passenger door. Did they. That is agrguable. They didn't follow thru on their word. We ended up in arbitration, and didn't get exactly what we had agreed on in the contract. All is not exactly as it seems, even when we have it in writing. I wouldn't be supprised at all if Skywest buys us, ignores the scope, and takes their chances in court, if it gets that far.
__________________
"Advancement begins at the point where opportunity and lack of self respect meet."
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
 |
|
 |
05-14-2008, 09:30 PM
|
#50 (permalink)
|
|
Commercial
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 560
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by glennhill
Yes, that's exactly what I have been thinking about. Our own management aggreed to pay us by the main passenger door. Did they. That is agrguable. They didn't follow thru on their word. We ended up in arbitration, and didn't get exactly what we had agreed on in the contract. All is not exactly as it seems, even when we have it in writing. I wouldn't be supprised at all if Skywest buys us, ignores the scope, and takes their chances in court, if it gets that far.
|
I don't know when you got hired..but the real truth about the MCD was not that the company didn't want to pay us by the contract...it was that they didn't realize that the computer system was to complex to set up to resolve the issue.....so they offered various (i.e. LOA 6, 6.1 and 6.2) to resolve it in another manner. But since soooo many pilots decided to stick to their guns....you now get 23min extra pay instead of 30.
Moral of the story....be careful what you ask for.
And SKYW would be taking a huge chance by trying to outright ignore the CBA.
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:18 AM.
|
|
|