View Single Post
Old 06-08-2008, 11:31 PM   #17 (permalink)
mckpickle
 
mckpickle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 5,139
mckpickle is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TA View Post
Good grief ladies, settle down! There has been absolutely nothing official about furloughs, COLAs, or early out pkgs. There has only been tons of meaningless speculation on CALForums. The total aircraft loss over the next 18 months is 31 frames. With 10 pilots per aircraft (a generous estimate) brings the total possible furloughs to around 300 IF we actually furlough at all.

Of course there will be no flow back agreement. I can't believe you guys actually took that bait...Pickle and Matt should really know better. You know that JerseyKid is one of the biggest douchbags on this forum (which speaks volumes!)

I would imagine that COLAs and early outs will completely mitigate any furloughs anyway. Reducing our line production averages by only 5 hours would require an additional 300+ pilots, so that is also an option to take care of any possible furlough. Add to that the strong rumors of 8 more 777's and a handful of 757-300s from ATA that would have to be staffed.

Bottom line, I don't have any idea where the 450 number comes from. Lots of fear mongering coming from downtown IAH I would imagine, especially since we are in contract negotiation openers...don't believe the hype...

Of course I know there'd be no FTA. I was just stating that I'm open to discussion on the idea Hey you could make it worth it I honestly don't think you'll see any there either. This whole fuel thing just happens to come while your contract is up for negotiations. Funny how that works. Jeez, you guys just can't catch a break!
__________________
Steve McKnight



.... hopefully your level of future satisfaction meets your level of present expectation. I think you're being fooled. Again.
-------Sumner Nelson---------
mckpickle is offline   Reply With Quote