Quote:
|
Originally Posted by twoears99
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Uncle Sam
With respect to a lot of religious people, many dont feel a need to ignore knowledge or compete with scientific discoveries. Many religious people are able to do just what you describe
coexist.
|
Then why are we debating intelligent design in our court systems? Every scientific discovery that goes against the bible (and many of them do) is being "disproven" by so- called "fellow scientists", their works injected into the doctrine of the evangelical world, which then uses this as an argument that science is wrong on message boards like this.
If Intelligent design is going to be taught in Public Schools (some of them are), then churches should start their sessions with "Things the Bible could be wrong, because their is science proves otherwise" in order to maintain their tax free status.
Paul
Oh and, If we are all God's children, what is so special about Jesus? |
I.D. is crap and last year a judge that Bush appointed in Pennsylvania told a school board they couldn't use I.D. as a competing theory to Evolution. (**** activist judges! :shock: )
I'll take your argument one step further. I'll let a school board come and try and teach my kids about I.D. in science class when they allow us to go to church on Sunday and debate their B.S.
It sounds absurd which is my point. ID has not business mixed with science and that's why many in science won't debate it. Not because they can't, but because it's foolish and lends cridibility to nonsense.